The bank organises credit risk management processes in line with the principles and requirements set out in the resolutions and recommendations of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (PFSA) (in particular Recommendation S, T and C) and CRR/CRDIV, which address issues related to credit risk management.
Credit risk inherent in financing of mBank Group clients is assessed based on shared statistical models developed for the AIRB (Advanced Internal Rating-Based) approach and uniform tools, and is based on common definitions of terms and parameters used in the credit risk management and rating process. The bank ensures their cohesion at the Group level.
The Group uses different models for particular client segments. The rules governing clear assignment of clients to a system are defined in the bank and the Group subsidiaries internal regulations.
In their credit risk management process, the bank and the Group subsidiaries use the core risk measures defined under the AIRB approach:
- PD – Probability of Default (%);
- LGD (Loss Given Default) – estimated relative loss in case of default (%);
- EAD (Exposure at Default) – estimated exposure at the time of default (amount);
- EL – Expected Loss taking into account the probability of default (amount);
and related measures including:
- RD (Risk Density) – relative expected loss defined as EL to EAD (%);
- LAD (Loss at Default) – estimated loss (amount) in case of default (the product of EAD and LGD).
In the decision-making process, for reporting and communication with business units, PD and EL are expressed in the language of rating classes whose definitions (Masterscale) are uniform across Commerzbank Group.
In its credit risk management process, the bank also attaches great importance to the assessment of unexpected loss. For this purpose, the bank uses the RWA (Risk Weighted Assets) measure, which is applied, under the AIRB approach, to calculate regulatory capital required to cover credit risk (unexpected loss).
In managing mortgage-secured credit exposures the Group uses the LtV ratio (Loan to Value), i.e. the value of the loan to the market value (or mortgage banking calculated value) of the real estate which secures the loan.
Stress testing is an additional tool of credit risk assessment. Stress testing of the regulatory capital and economic capital required to cover credit risk is carried out quarterly.
In addition to the tools listed above, which are applied both in the corporate and in the retail credit risk measurement, the Group uses tools specific to these areas.
For corporate credit risk the Group defines maximum exposure to a client/group of related clients using the following credit risk mitigating measures:
- MBPZO (Maximum Safe Total Exposure), which defines the maximum level of financial debt of an entity from financial institutions calculated under the bank’s methodology, approved by the bank’s competent decision-making body. An alternative measure used by the bank to clients applying for small exposure is Borrowing Capacity (BC);
- LG (General Limit), which defines the level of credit risk financial exposure to a client/group of related clients acceptable to the Group, approved by the bank’s competent decision-making body. LG includes a structured limit and products granted outside the structured limit.
In order to minimise credit risk, the Group uses a broad range of collateral for credit products, which also enable active management of the capital requirement. In the assessment of the quality of collaterals for risk products, mBank and mLeasing use the MRV ratio (Most Realistic Value) reflecting the pessimistic variant of debt recovery from the collateral through forced sale.
The level of profitability from relations with clients is taken into account in credit decision process, so that the planned level of profitability covers at least the estimated amounts of the expected loss on bank customer involvement.
Retail credit risk measures are constructed to reflect the characteristics of this customer segment and, in the case of portfolio measures, the high granularity of the loan portfolio:
- DtI (Debt-to-Income) – i.e. monthly credit payments to the net income of a household (used for individual customers);
- DPD (Days-Past-Due) – a family of portfolio risk measures based on the number of days past due date (e.g. share of contracts which are from 31 to 90 days past due date in the total portfolio by number or by value);
- Vintage ratios, which present the quality of cohorts of loans grouped by disbursement time at a different phase of their lifetime;
- COR (Cost of risk) – cost of risk for a loan portfolio (segment), i.e. ratio of credit provisions result (or changes in valuation of contracts based on fair value approach) to the exposure;
- Roll-rates, which measure the migration of contracts between days-past-due brackets (1-30, 31-60, 61-90 DPD, etc.).
Corporate and Investment Banking
In accordance with the Corporate Credit Risk Management Strategy in mBank Group, the main goal in this area is defining a safe level of risk appetite in sales of risk-bearing products to the Group clients and use synergies by integrating the offer of the bank and Group subsidiaries. The Strategy is realised by credit risk policies, limits reducing the risk and the principles of risk assessment of business entities applying for financing. The bank manages credit risk both at the single entity level and the consolidated level.
The Group actively manages credit risk aiming to optimise profitability taking into account the cost of risk. In its current credit risk management and determination of concentration risk, the bank performs quarterly portfolio analyses using a Steering Matrix which incorporates PD rating and LAD.
The bank monitors credit portfolio on a quarterly basis including an analysis of the dynamics of change in size and (sector) segmentation of the credit portfolio, client risk (analysis of PD rating), quality of collateral against credit exposures, the scale of change in EL, Risk Density, and default exposures.
The Group strives to avoid concentration in industries and sectors where credit risk is considered excessively high. The bank uses internally defined industry limits for day-to-day management of the sector concentration risk.
In compliance with the Recommendation S of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (PFSA), the bank has identified a mortgage-secured credit exposure portfolio in retail and corporate banking and applies the Mortgage-Secured Credit Exposure Risk Management Policy. The bank manages the mortgage-secured credit exposure portfolio risk with a focus on defining an optimised portfolio structure in terms of quality (rating), currencies, country regions, tenors, and types of properties.
For international companies, non-banking financial institutions and biggest corporate clients, mBank Group promotes innovative products with low capital consumption, in particular products of investment banking, transactional banking and financial markets instruments.
mBank offers innovative investment products as part of a new integrated platform that ensures appropriate product selection and efficient use of capital.
The bank, in the corporate banking area, on regular basis, adapted credit risk policy and the credit risk management process to the economic situation caused by the coronavirus pandemic. In the field of credit policy, the bank:
- tightened criteria of granting new financing
- modified rules of financing clients operating in industries exposed – according to bank’s opinion – to negative effects of pandemic
- prepared dedicated regulations that implemented solutions presented in banks’ approach in scope of unified rules of offering support for the clients of the banking system.
With regard to credit risk management process, during the meetings of Corporate and Investment Banking Risk Committee reports and analytical materials concerning impact of pandemic on the quality of credit portfolio, as well as regulations that adjust credit policy to the changes of market environment are presented. The frequency of the Committee meetings was increased and adjusted to current needs of credit risk management during the pandemic.
Retail Banking
Lending in retail banking is a key segment of the Group’s business model, both in terms of the share in total assets and the contribution to its profits.
As credit exposures are highly granular (more than 2 million active loans), the retail banking credit risk management process is based on a portfolio approach. This is reflected in the statistical profile of risk rating models including the models which fulfil the regulatory requirements of the Advanced Internal Ratings-Based approach (AIRB). The AIRB parameters (PD, LGD and EL) are used widely in order to estimate credit requirements, to determine acceptance criteria and terms of transactions, and to report risks.
Furthermore, the Retail Banking credit risk management has the following characteristics:
- high standardisation and automation of the credit process, including decision-making, both in acquisition, post-sale services, and debt collection;
- little (as compared to Corporate Banking) discretionary competences in the decision-making process (e.g. no discretionary adjustment of clients’ ratings);
- extensive risk reporting system based on portfolio analysis of credit exposure quality, including vintage analysis and roll-rates analysis.
The main point of reference in the retail banking credit risk management process is risk appetite defined in correlation with the strategy of mBank Group. The general principle underlying the lending strategy of the Group in terms of sales of retail loans is to address the offer to clients who have an established relationship with the bank or to address it to new clients for whom the loan is a product initiating a long-term relationship of highly transactional nature. Thereby, the bank continues to focus its non-mortgage loans policies on lending to existing clients with a high creditworthiness. To reduce risks of accepting new clients, the bank develops its credit policy using, among others, credit testing and is actively developing its fraud prevention system.
The new acquisition focuses on products which may be financed with issue of mortgage bonds. Those exposures will then be transferred to mBank Hipoteczny in the pooling process to enable the issue of mortgage bonds. The conservative policy of assessing borrowers’ reliability and creditworthiness is applied; taking into account, inter alia, current, historically lowest, levels of interest rates, the Group attaches special attention to the application of long-term estimates of interest rate while assessing creditworthiness.
In order to mitigate the risk associated with a decrease in the value of mortgage collateral in relation to the value of credit exposure, the Group’s credit offer is (and will be) directed mainly to clients who buy standard properties within large urban areas.
Bank adapted its current credit policy for mortgage loans and non-mortgage loans segment to expected economic downturn caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in credit policy address most probable risks:
- lower income of customers,
- lower turnover on the customer’s accounts,
- increased unemployment rate,
- permanent or temporary deterioration of financial standing in particular sectors particularly exposed, in opinion of the bank, to the negative effect of the pandemic
Bank increased the frequency of Risk and Business Forum meetings. We analyse current situation of customers, sales volumes and approval rates. According to those analysis credit policy is subject to rapid revision.
As of December 31, 2020, the share of impaired exposures in the total (gross) amount of loans and advances granted to clients (NPL) increased to 4.8% from 4.5% at the end of 2019. The change of the indicator applies mainly to corporate banking and is caused by including the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the portfolio under observation.
In accordance with the EBA guidelines on management of non-performing and forborne exposures, which came into force from June 30, 2019, banks are obliged to monitor and manage the NPL portfolio. Banks should strive to maintain the value of the NPL portfolio below the threshold set by the regulator at 5%. As of December 31, 2020, the NPLREG ratio (ratio calculated according to EBA guidelines) was at 4.4%. Provisions (defined as credit risk costs for loans and advances to customers, i.e. provisions for loans and advances at amortised cost and fair value change of loans and advances mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss) increased from PLN 3,574.2 million at the end of December 2019 to PLN 3,962.6 million at the end of December 2020.
The coverage ratio (with provisions as defined earlier) decreased in the analysed period from 60.7% in December 2019 to 58.2% in December 2020. The change of the indicator applies mainly to corporate banking and is caused by the increase in new exposures in Stage 3, which are characterized by a lower coverage ratio.
The manner of identifying evidence of default is based on all available credit data of a given client and encompasses all of the client’s liabilities towards the bank.
The table below presents the quality of mBank Group loan portfolio as at the end of December 2019 and as at the end of December 2020.
Loans and advances to clients 31.12.2019 (PLN (‘000)) |
At amortised cost | At fair value | Loans and advances, total |
---|---|---|---|
Gross carrying amount | 106,393,532 | 2,517,750 | 108,911,282 |
Non-performing loans and advances | 4,343,285 | 514,222 | 4,857,507 |
Non-performing loans ratio (NPL) | 4.1% | 20.4% | 4.5% |
Provisions for non-performing loans | -2,619,125 | -331,454 | -2,950,579 |
Provisions for performing loans | -571,153 | -52,485 | -623,638 |
Coverage ratio | 60.3% | 64.5% | 60.7% |
Coverage ratio, including provisions for performing loans | 73.5% | 74.7% | 73.6% |
Loans and advances to clients 31.12.2020 (PLN (‘000)) |
At amortised cost | At fair value | Loans and advances, total |
---|---|---|---|
Gross carrying amount | 111,778,636 | 2,015,959 | 113,794,595 |
Non-performing loans and advances | 5,024,146 | 423,905 | 5,448,051 |
Non-performing loans ratio (NPL) | 4,5% | 21.0% | 4.8% |
Provisions for non-performing loans | -2,902,799 | -265,583 | -3,168,382 |
Provisions for performing loans | -738,027 | -56,211 | -794,238 |
Coverage ratio | 57.8% | 62.7% | 58.2% |
Coverage ratio, including provisions for performing loans | 72.5% | 75.9% | 72.7% |